« Even the big guys screw up their brandingKeep up your regular blog writing or else! »

3 comments

  1. § Carole Email said on :
    *****
    A really well written and informative blog. Certainly points in the right direction as far as "look and feel" of email newsletters. Brands/clients don't realise that email marketing is a hugely valuable tool at present - getting the dazzle right in the beginning will definitely increase the recipient's awareness towards the marketing message.
  2. § Kevin Trye Email said on :
    ****-
    I tend to agree with the article, since a professional, branded email has higher credibility and builds trust. However technology gets in the way of our best intentions, since the old issue of deliver-ability of graphic, html emails remains.

    I think the other thing here is that the writer has looked at the email from his perspective, not the clients. Designers will always look at the ''look of the piece, rather than the content, similarly with printers who examine the paper and quality, but not the message and copywriters similarly look at the words, not so much the graphics. As marketers we must accept we all view the world from different perspectives and through our own tinted glasses.

    Back to the delivery issue - Every graphic or link added, reduces the odds of it getting through. Unless huge amounts of care, effort and expense are put into the campaign to ensure optimised content and email validation to avoid both ISP and outlook/desktop spam filters, then the majority of branded graphical campaign messages will remain undelivered or unopened.

    It's well known that plain text emails generally have much higher odds of getting through which is still why they are used far more often by direct response marketers. The math indicates that plain text emails get them more sales to established clients.

    Technically, sending out a plain text email with a single attachment, say a pdf brochure, does produce surprising results in terms of ROI. Studies in the uk by major utilities indicated they got a 20-30% higher response (sales) by doing this over html emails. If those pdfs are personalised, and tracked (yes it's possible to track distributed pdf files now through analytics), then we have the best of both worlds. Good delivery and a professional document and, hopefully, good branding within.

    If all this seems too hard, at some point in the cost equation, it could conceivably end up more cost-effective to use direct mail, especially with key clients who should always be segmented out anyway for special treatment. Better still, use both channels... In the retail space, it gets around 15% more bottom-line sales.
  3. § Wayne Attwell® Email said on :
    Good points that you make here Kevin. The post was written by an accomplished graphic designer so it does ave a slant in that direction. You're quite right about the issue of getting through email filters. Our EmailMarketer service runs the test emails through 25 of the most prevalent spam filters as well as a compliance test against over 20 email clients (using Litmus), so we do get a high delivery rate.

    Of course 'open rate' can be effected by so many factors, such as quality and relevance of the subject line, whether their is a recognizable and accepted company or individuals name in the subject line etc. I think that if you actually get the email delivered to an inbox, plain text or html, then 'open rate' is dependent on subject line, time of day etc.

    One of the risks of plain text email with an attachment, is that many junk mail settings will filter out or block emails with attachments, if the settings are too conservative. The other issue is that typically it is the end-user generating and sending plain text emails via Outlook on their desktop. Once your list gets to a reasonable size you do run the risk of your ISP blocking you as a poptential spammer, whereas with a dedicated email hosted system, the sending servers are generally well known and accepted as bonafide maling servers, so are much less likely to be blocked (provided you8 host and send with a reputable provider).

    Typically we get less than 0.3% 'blocked' for our html emails, so delivery doesn't appear to be an issue. What does cause more non-delivery issues are mailboxes that are full, DNS failures, invalid email addresses etc, which would affect plain text emails to the same extent.

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)